What does open-weight mean?
Open-weight means the model weights are downloadable. It does not necessarily mean the training data, code or full development process is open, and the license may still restrict some uses.
Track the models, countries and local formats reshaping open AI. Every number is dated, sourced and scoped.
Daily series + dated research reports
90 daily observations, 29 Jun 2026–26 Sept 2026: 34.9% at the start, 77.7% on the latest day. Period peak: 80.6%.
Daily Vercel AI Gateway token volume Not global AI usage
Data through 26 Sept 2026 (UTC). Checked daily; last retrieved 27 Sept 2026.
Adapted from Vercel AI Gateway open data under CC BY 4.0; 90-day selection and display rounding by LocalClaw.
| Date | Open weights | Closed weights |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-29 | 34.9% | 65.1% |
| 2026-06-30 | 34.1% | 65.9% |
| 2026-07-01 | 27.5% | 72.5% |
| 2026-07-02 | 31.3% | 68.7% |
| 2026-07-03 | 41.4% | 58.6% |
| 2026-07-04 | 43.0% | 57.0% |
| 2026-07-05 | 46.6% | 53.4% |
| 2026-07-06 | 44.6% | 55.4% |
| 2026-07-07 | 46.7% | 53.3% |
| 2026-07-08 | 44.2% | 55.8% |
| 2026-07-09 | 46.3% | 53.7% |
| 2026-07-10 | 46.5% | 53.5% |
| 2026-07-11 | 50.7% | 49.3% |
| 2026-07-12 | 49.8% | 50.2% |
| 2026-07-13 | 46.4% | 53.6% |
| 2026-07-14 | 49.0% | 51.0% |
| 2026-07-15 | 45.7% | 54.3% |
| 2026-07-16 | 44.5% | 55.5% |
| 2026-07-17 | 42.6% | 57.4% |
| 2026-07-18 | 46.3% | 53.7% |
| 2026-07-19 | 49.6% | 50.4% |
| 2026-07-20 | 49.1% | 50.9% |
| 2026-07-21 | 51.0% | 49.0% |
| 2026-07-22 | 40.6% | 59.4% |
| 2026-07-23 | 42.2% | 57.8% |
| 2026-07-24 | 49.0% | 51.0% |
| 2026-07-25 | 49.3% | 50.7% |
| 2026-07-26 | 54.1% | 45.9% |
| 2026-07-27 | 48.3% | 51.7% |
| 2026-07-28 | 47.6% | 52.4% |
| 2026-07-29 | 45.4% | 54.6% |
| 2026-07-30 | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| 2026-07-31 | 45.8% | 54.2% |
| 2026-08-01 | 52.8% | 47.2% |
| 2026-08-02 | 53.5% | 46.5% |
| 2026-08-03 | 49.0% | 51.0% |
| 2026-08-04 | 48.0% | 52.0% |
| 2026-08-05 | 48.6% | 51.4% |
| 2026-08-06 | 54.1% | 45.9% |
| 2026-08-07 | 56.7% | 43.3% |
| 2026-08-08 | 61.4% | 38.6% |
| 2026-08-09 | 60.2% | 39.8% |
| 2026-08-10 | 54.0% | 46.0% |
| 2026-08-11 | 53.6% | 46.4% |
| 2026-08-12 | 50.5% | 49.5% |
| 2026-08-13 | 52.7% | 47.3% |
| 2026-08-14 | 52.3% | 47.7% |
| 2026-08-15 | 50.8% | 49.2% |
| 2026-08-16 | 55.8% | 44.2% |
| 2026-08-17 | 52.4% | 47.6% |
| 2026-08-18 | 51.8% | 48.2% |
| 2026-08-19 | 56.4% | 43.6% |
| 2026-08-20 | 56.6% | 43.4% |
| 2026-08-21 | 56.8% | 43.2% |
| 2026-08-22 | 61.6% | 38.4% |
| 2026-08-23 | 60.7% | 39.3% |
| 2026-08-24 | 50.1% | 49.9% |
| 2026-08-25 | 52.5% | 47.5% |
| 2026-08-26 | 57.6% | 42.4% |
| 2026-08-27 | 60.1% | 39.9% |
| 2026-08-28 | 62.6% | 37.4% |
| 2026-08-29 | 69.9% | 30.1% |
| 2026-08-30 | 71.3% | 28.7% |
| 2026-08-31 | 61.8% | 38.2% |
| 2026-09-01 | 61.3% | 38.7% |
| 2026-09-02 | 61.0% | 39.0% |
| 2026-09-03 | 60.9% | 39.1% |
| 2026-09-04 | 58.9% | 41.1% |
| 2026-09-05 | 67.3% | 32.7% |
| 2026-09-06 | 65.3% | 34.7% |
| 2026-09-07 | 61.8% | 38.2% |
| 2026-09-08 | 58.0% | 42.0% |
| 2026-09-09 | 56.0% | 44.0% |
| 2026-09-10 | 66.4% | 33.6% |
| 2026-09-11 | 73.3% | 26.7% |
| 2026-09-12 | 78.0% | 22.0% |
| 2026-09-13 | 79.5% | 20.5% |
| 2026-09-14 | 72.6% | 27.4% |
| 2026-09-15 | 74.8% | 25.2% |
| 2026-09-16 | 74.9% | 25.1% |
| 2026-09-17 | 76.3% | 23.7% |
| 2026-09-18 | 78.4% | 21.6% |
| 2026-09-19 | 80.1% | 19.9% |
| 2026-09-20 | 80.6% | 19.4% |
| 2026-09-21 | 76.4% | 23.6% |
| 2026-09-22 | 77.1% | 22.9% |
| 2026-09-23 | 75.4% | 24.6% |
| 2026-09-24 | 73.1% | 26.9% |
| 2026-09-25 | 70.1% | 29.9% |
| 2026-09-26 | 77.7% | 22.3% |
Where models are built and where they are adopted do not always line up. Production and usage need separate measures.
Report snapshots · The figures below describe their stated periods. They change when publishers release new comparable research, not every day.
In 2025, U.S.-based institutions produced 59 notable models, compared with 35 from China.
Notable models released in 2025 Stanford AI Index 2026
View source| Country | Models |
|---|---|
| United States | 59 |
| China | 35 |
Chinese-origin models represented 41% of Hugging Face downloads in the preceding year, as reported in March 2026.
Hugging Face · Report published 17 Mar 2026 Unclear country origins are a known limitation
View source| Origin | Share |
|---|---|
| China | 41% |
| Rest of world | 59% |
Production leadership and adoption leadership are not the same metric.
Among Hugging Face models that declare a parameter count, models under 1B represent 83% of all-time downloads.
Hugging Face · Report published 14 Aug 2026 All-time downloads, declared parameter counts only
View source| Model size | Share |
|---|---|
| Under 1B | 83% |
| 1B to 100B | 16% |
| Above 100B | 1% |
During the first seven months of 2026, repositories declaring GGUF grew far faster than the Hub overall.
Repository growth, Jan–Jul 2026 Hugging Face report · 14 Aug 2026
View source| Format or group | Growth |
|---|---|
| GGUF | 464% |
| MLX | 148% |
| Hub overall | 21.5% |
| Transformers / PEFT | 16% |
Vercel token shares reflect production traffic routed through AI Gateway, not all global AI use. Downloads show activity inside one ecosystem. They are not unique users, revenue or global market share. Country refers to the originating organization, not where inference runs.
The Vercel series is checked daily and keeps 90 completed UTC days, without filling missing observations. A failed refresh preserves the last verified snapshot; the page warns when the latest observation is more than three days old. Research reports are reviewed weekly, with their original periods kept visible.
Open-weight means the model weights are downloadable. It does not necessarily mean the training data, code or full development process is open, and the license may still restrict some uses.
No. It is the daily share of tokens routed through Vercel AI Gateway on models with downloadable weights. It is a production signal inside that gateway, not global market share.
Downloads and repository growth show where models become practical. GGUF and MLX connect open weights to hardware people can actually operate.